From: Yuan ZhaoXiong <yuanzhaoxiong@baidu.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2021 13:11:55 +0000 (+0800)
Subject: sched: Optimize housekeeping_cpumask() in for_each_cpu_and()
X-Git-Url: http://git.maquefel.me/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=031e3bd8986fffe31e1ddbf5264cccfe30c9abd7;p=linux.git

sched: Optimize housekeeping_cpumask() in for_each_cpu_and()

On a 128 cores AMD machine, there are 8 cores in nohz_full mode, and
the others are used for housekeeping. When many housekeeping cpus are
in idle state, we can observe huge time burn in the loop for searching
nearest busy housekeeper cpu by ftrace.

   9)               |              get_nohz_timer_target() {
   9)               |                housekeeping_test_cpu() {
   9)   0.390 us    |                  housekeeping_get_mask.part.1();
   9)   0.561 us    |                }
   9)   0.090 us    |                __rcu_read_lock();
   9)   0.090 us    |                housekeeping_cpumask();
   9)   0.521 us    |                housekeeping_cpumask();
   9)   0.140 us    |                housekeeping_cpumask();

   ...

   9)   0.500 us    |                housekeeping_cpumask();
   9)               |                housekeeping_any_cpu() {
   9)   0.090 us    |                  housekeeping_get_mask.part.1();
   9)   0.100 us    |                  sched_numa_find_closest();
   9)   0.491 us    |                }
   9)   0.100 us    |                __rcu_read_unlock();
   9) + 76.163 us   |              }

for_each_cpu_and() is a micro function, so in get_nohz_timer_target()
function the
        for_each_cpu_and(i, sched_domain_span(sd),
                housekeeping_cpumask(HK_FLAG_TIMER))
equals to below:
        for (i = -1; i = cpumask_next_and(i, sched_domain_span(sd),
                housekeeping_cpumask(HK_FLAG_TIMER)), i < nr_cpu_ids;)
That will cause that housekeeping_cpumask() will be invoked many times.
The housekeeping_cpumask() function returns a const value, so it is
unnecessary to invoke it every time. This patch can minimize the worst
searching time from ~76us to ~16us in my testing.

Similarly, the find_new_ilb() function has the same problem.

Co-developed-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuan ZhaoXiong <yuanzhaoxiong@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1622985115-51007-1-git-send-email-yuanzhaoxiong@baidu.com
---

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 2883c22eef102..0c22cd026440c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -993,6 +993,7 @@ int get_nohz_timer_target(void)
 {
 	int i, cpu = smp_processor_id(), default_cpu = -1;
 	struct sched_domain *sd;
+	const struct cpumask *hk_mask;
 
 	if (housekeeping_cpu(cpu, HK_FLAG_TIMER)) {
 		if (!idle_cpu(cpu))
@@ -1000,10 +1001,11 @@ int get_nohz_timer_target(void)
 		default_cpu = cpu;
 	}
 
+	hk_mask = housekeeping_cpumask(HK_FLAG_TIMER);
+
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	for_each_domain(cpu, sd) {
-		for_each_cpu_and(i, sched_domain_span(sd),
-			housekeeping_cpumask(HK_FLAG_TIMER)) {
+		for_each_cpu_and(i, sched_domain_span(sd), hk_mask) {
 			if (cpu == i)
 				continue;
 
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 45edf61eed737..11d22943753fa 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -10188,9 +10188,11 @@ static inline int on_null_domain(struct rq *rq)
 static inline int find_new_ilb(void)
 {
 	int ilb;
+	const struct cpumask *hk_mask;
 
-	for_each_cpu_and(ilb, nohz.idle_cpus_mask,
-			      housekeeping_cpumask(HK_FLAG_MISC)) {
+	hk_mask = housekeeping_cpumask(HK_FLAG_MISC);
+
+	for_each_cpu_and(ilb, nohz.idle_cpus_mask, hk_mask) {
 
 		if (ilb == smp_processor_id())
 			continue;