From: Marc Zyngier Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 12:38:59 +0000 (+0100) Subject: KVM: arm64: Narrow PMU sysreg reset values to architectural requirements X-Git-Url: http://git.maquefel.me/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=0ab410a93d627ae73136d1a52c096262360b7992;p=linux.git KVM: arm64: Narrow PMU sysreg reset values to architectural requirements A number of the PMU sysregs expose reset values that are not compliant with the architecture (set bits in the RES0 ranges, for example). This in turn has the effect that we need to pointlessly mask some register fields when using them. Let's start by making sure we don't have illegal values in the shadow registers at reset time. This affects all the registers that dedicate one bit per counter, the counters themselves, PMEVTYPERn_EL0 and PMSELR_EL0. Reported-by: Alexandre Chartre Reviewed-by: Alexandre Chartre Acked-by: Russell King (Oracle) Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Reviewed-by: Alexandru Elisei Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210719123902.1493805-2-maz@kernel.org --- diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c index f6f126eb6ac13..96bdfa0e68b22 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c @@ -603,6 +603,41 @@ static unsigned int pmu_visibility(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, return REG_HIDDEN; } +static void reset_pmu_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r) +{ + u64 n, mask = BIT(ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX); + + /* No PMU available, any PMU reg may UNDEF... */ + if (!kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3()) + return; + + n = read_sysreg(pmcr_el0) >> ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT; + n &= ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_MASK; + if (n) + mask |= GENMASK(n - 1, 0); + + reset_unknown(vcpu, r); + __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= mask; +} + +static void reset_pmevcntr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r) +{ + reset_unknown(vcpu, r); + __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= GENMASK(31, 0); +} + +static void reset_pmevtyper(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r) +{ + reset_unknown(vcpu, r); + __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= ARMV8_PMU_EVTYPE_MASK; +} + +static void reset_pmselr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r) +{ + reset_unknown(vcpu, r); + __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= ARMV8_PMU_COUNTER_MASK; +} + static void reset_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r) { u64 pmcr, val; @@ -944,16 +979,18 @@ static bool access_pmuserenr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p, trap_wcr, reset_wcr, 0, 0, get_wcr, set_wcr } #define PMU_SYS_REG(r) \ - SYS_DESC(r), .reset = reset_unknown, .visibility = pmu_visibility + SYS_DESC(r), .reset = reset_pmu_reg, .visibility = pmu_visibility /* Macro to expand the PMEVCNTRn_EL0 register */ #define PMU_PMEVCNTR_EL0(n) \ { PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMEVCNTRn_EL0(n)), \ + .reset = reset_pmevcntr, \ .access = access_pmu_evcntr, .reg = (PMEVCNTR0_EL0 + n), } /* Macro to expand the PMEVTYPERn_EL0 register */ #define PMU_PMEVTYPER_EL0(n) \ { PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMEVTYPERn_EL0(n)), \ + .reset = reset_pmevtyper, \ .access = access_pmu_evtyper, .reg = (PMEVTYPER0_EL0 + n), } static bool undef_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p, @@ -1595,13 +1632,13 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = { { PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMSWINC_EL0), .access = access_pmswinc, .reg = PMSWINC_EL0 }, { PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMSELR_EL0), - .access = access_pmselr, .reg = PMSELR_EL0 }, + .access = access_pmselr, .reset = reset_pmselr, .reg = PMSELR_EL0 }, { PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCEID0_EL0), .access = access_pmceid, .reset = NULL }, { PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCEID1_EL0), .access = access_pmceid, .reset = NULL }, { PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCCNTR_EL0), - .access = access_pmu_evcntr, .reg = PMCCNTR_EL0 }, + .access = access_pmu_evcntr, .reset = reset_unknown, .reg = PMCCNTR_EL0 }, { PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMXEVTYPER_EL0), .access = access_pmu_evtyper, .reset = NULL }, { PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMXEVCNTR_EL0),