From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 10:55:08 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: hwspinlock: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
X-Git-Url: http://git.maquefel.me/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=0e01d176d5788f66dc64a7e61119edb56eb08339;p=linux.git

hwspinlock: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
for simplifing code

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220418105508.2558696-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn
---

diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
index 33eeff94fc2ab..1fb3a2550e292 100644
--- a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
@@ -94,11 +94,9 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	 * the module SYSSTATUS register
 	 */
 	pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(&pdev->dev);
+	if (ret < 0)
 		goto runtime_err;
-	}
 
 	/* Determine number of locks */
 	i = readl(io_base + SYSSTATUS_OFFSET);