From: Paul E. McKenney Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 00:22:34 +0000 (-0700) Subject: rcu: Remove rsp parameter from note_gp_changes() X-Git-Url: http://git.maquefel.me/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=15cabdffbbf629f2588612f092bdb37dfa16cc79;p=linux.git rcu: Remove rsp parameter from note_gp_changes() There now is only one rcu_state structure in a given build of the Linux kernel, so there is no need to pass it as a parameter to RCU's functions. This commit therefore removes the rsp parameter from note_gp_changes(). Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney --- diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c index 3e1ec264a653f..9189f7c70df5f 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c @@ -1801,7 +1801,7 @@ static bool __note_gp_changes(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp) return ret; } -static void note_gp_changes(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp) +static void note_gp_changes(struct rcu_data *rdp) { unsigned long flags; bool needwake; @@ -2375,7 +2375,7 @@ static void rcu_check_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp) { /* Check for grace-period ends and beginnings. */ - note_gp_changes(rsp, rdp); + note_gp_changes(rdp); /* * Does this CPU still need to do its part for current grace period? @@ -2840,7 +2840,7 @@ static void __call_rcu_core(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp, rdp->qlen_last_fqs_check + qhimark)) { /* Are we ignoring a completed grace period? */ - note_gp_changes(rsp, rdp); + note_gp_changes(rdp); /* Start a new grace period if one not already started. */ if (!rcu_gp_in_progress()) { diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h index 0c59c3987c60c..82f10a6bf266e 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h @@ -1586,7 +1586,7 @@ static bool __maybe_unused rcu_try_advance_all_cbs(void) rcu_seq_current(&rnp->gp_seq)) || unlikely(READ_ONCE(rdp->gpwrap))) && rcu_segcblist_pend_cbs(&rdp->cblist)) - note_gp_changes(rsp, rdp); + note_gp_changes(rdp); if (rcu_segcblist_ready_cbs(&rdp->cblist)) cbs_ready = true;