From: Rodrigo Vivi Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 04:21:53 +0000 (-0500) Subject: drm/doc/rfc: Move Xe 'ASYNC VM_BIND' to the 'completed' section X-Git-Url: http://git.maquefel.me/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=16805e994bff2db40362b9007f3fcd476571a15e;p=linux.git drm/doc/rfc: Move Xe 'ASYNC VM_BIND' to the 'completed' section As already indicated in this block, the consensus was already reached out and documented as: The ASYNC VM_BIND document However this was item was not moved to the completed section. Let's move and clean up the WIP block. Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231201042158.80009-4-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com Acked-by: Daniel Vetter --- diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/rfc/xe.rst b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/xe.rst index 9f3afab6c06ac..87dd620aea594 100644 --- a/Documentation/gpu/rfc/xe.rst +++ b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/xe.rst @@ -70,18 +70,6 @@ When the time comes for Xe, the protection will be lifted on Xe and kept in i915 Xe – Pre-Merge Goals - Work-in-Progress ======================================= -ASYNC VM_BIND -------------- -Although having a common DRM level IOCTL for VM_BIND is not a requirement to get -Xe merged, it is mandatory to have a consensus with other drivers and Mesa. -It needs to be clear how to handle async VM_BIND and interactions with userspace -memory fences. Ideally with helper support so people don't get it wrong in all -possible ways. - -As a key measurable result, the benefits of ASYNC VM_BIND and a discussion of -various flavors, error handling and sample API suggestions are documented in -:doc:`The ASYNC VM_BIND document `. - Userptr integration and vm_bind ------------------------------- Different drivers implement different ways of dealing with execution of userptr. @@ -151,6 +139,18 @@ Xe – uAPI high level overview Xe – Pre-Merge Goals - Completed ================================ +ASYNC VM_BIND +------------- +Although having a common DRM level IOCTL for VM_BIND is not a requirement to get +Xe merged, it is mandatory to have a consensus with other drivers and Mesa. +It needs to be clear how to handle async VM_BIND and interactions with userspace +memory fences. Ideally with helper support so people don't get it wrong in all +possible ways. + +As a key measurable result, the benefits of ASYNC VM_BIND and a discussion of +various flavors, error handling and sample API suggestions are documented in +:doc:`The ASYNC VM_BIND document `. + Drm_scheduler ------------- Xe primarily uses Firmware based scheduling (GuC FW). However, it will use