From: Filipe Manana Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 14:30:21 +0000 (+0100) Subject: btrfs: update comment at log_conflicting_inodes() X-Git-Url: http://git.maquefel.me/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=1f295373022e84683bc5768caca46bdba3a376c1;p=linux.git btrfs: update comment at log_conflicting_inodes() A comment at log_conflicting_inodes() mentions that we check the inode's logged_trans field instead of using btrfs_inode_in_log() because the field last_log_commit is not updated when we log that an inode exists and the inode has the full sync flag (BTRFS_INODE_NEEDS_FULL_SYNC) set. The part about the full sync flag is not true anymore since commit 9acc8103ab594f ("btrfs: fix unpersisted i_size on fsync after expanding truncate"), so update the comment to not mention that part anymore. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c index 5debb8c3663c9..1ce7e44802568 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c @@ -5092,8 +5092,8 @@ static int log_conflicting_inodes(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, /* * Check the inode's logged_trans only instead of * btrfs_inode_in_log(). This is because the last_log_commit of - * the inode is not updated when we only log that it exists and - * it has the full sync bit set (see btrfs_log_inode()). + * the inode is not updated when we only log that it exists (see + * btrfs_log_inode()). */ if (BTRFS_I(inode)->logged_trans == trans->transid) { spin_unlock(&BTRFS_I(inode)->lock);