From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 07:40:32 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: s390/mm,fault: use __ratelimit() instead of printk_ratelimit()
X-Git-Url: http://git.maquefel.me/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=28f3e0002aeaf9b02ace41551c92dc1c04f0de6e;p=linux.git

s390/mm,fault: use __ratelimit() instead of printk_ratelimit()

Just like other architectures make use __ratelimit() instead of
printk_ratelimit().

Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
---

diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
index c13999aa05269..d22a8fe5e4fcc 100644
--- a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
@@ -218,11 +218,13 @@ int show_unhandled_signals = 1;
 
 void report_user_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, long signr, int is_mm_fault)
 {
+	static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
+
 	if ((task_pid_nr(current) > 1) && !show_unhandled_signals)
 		return;
 	if (!unhandled_signal(current, signr))
 		return;
-	if (!printk_ratelimit())
+	if (!__ratelimit(&rs))
 		return;
 	printk(KERN_ALERT "User process fault: interruption code %04x ilc:%d ",
 	       regs->int_code & 0xffff, regs->int_code >> 17);