From: Marijn Suijten Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2021 12:01:01 +0000 (+0200) Subject: arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: Provide missing "xo" and "sleep_clk" to GCC X-Git-Url: http://git.maquefel.me/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2c2f64ae36d97c1ec756ed781640f7951f7bac42;p=linux.git arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: Provide missing "xo" and "sleep_clk" to GCC In a future patch the GCC driver will stop requesting this xo clock by its global "xo" name, in favour of having an explicit phandle here in the DT. Aside from that this clock in addition to the mandatory "sleep_clk" were never passed despite being required by the relevant dt-bindings. Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210911120101.248476-1-marijn.suijten@somainline.org --- diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi index 34039b5c80175..d284ffe9bd71d 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ clock-output-names = "xo_board"; }; - sleep_clk { + sleep_clk: sleep-clk { compatible = "fixed-clock"; #clock-cells = <0>; clock-frequency = <32764>; @@ -855,6 +855,9 @@ #reset-cells = <1>; #power-domain-cells = <1>; reg = <0x00100000 0xb0000>; + + clock-names = "xo", "sleep_clk"; + clocks = <&xo>, <&sleep_clk>; }; rpm_msg_ram: memory@778000 {