From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 16:14:43 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: entry: Correct __secure_computing() stub
X-Git-Url: http://git.maquefel.me/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=3135f5b73592988af0eb1b11ccbb72a8667be201;p=linux.git

entry: Correct __secure_computing() stub

The original version of that used secure_computing() which has no
arguments. Review requested to switch to __secure_computing() which has
one. The function name was correct, but no argument added and of course
compiling without SECCOMP was deemed overrated.

Add the missing function argument.

Fixes: 6823ecabf030 ("seccomp: Provide stub for __secure_computing()")
Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---

diff --git a/include/linux/seccomp.h b/include/linux/seccomp.h
index 03d28c32ad015..51f234b6d28f7 100644
--- a/include/linux/seccomp.h
+++ b/include/linux/seccomp.h
@@ -58,10 +58,11 @@ static inline int seccomp_mode(struct seccomp *s)
 
 struct seccomp { };
 struct seccomp_filter { };
+struct seccomp_data;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER
 static inline int secure_computing(void) { return 0; }
-static inline int __secure_computing(void) { return 0; }
+static inline int __secure_computing(const struct seccomp_data *sd) { return 0; }
 #else
 static inline void secure_computing_strict(int this_syscall) { return; }
 #endif