From: Ville Syrjälä Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 20:20:30 +0000 (+0300) Subject: drm/i915: Favor last VBT child device with conflicting AUX ch/DDC pin X-Git-Url: http://git.maquefel.me/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=41e35ffb380b;p=linux.git drm/i915: Favor last VBT child device with conflicting AUX ch/DDC pin The first come first served apporoach to handling the VBT child device AUX ch conflicts has backfired. We have machines in the wild where the VBT specifies both port A eDP and port E DP (in that order) with port E being the real one. So let's try to flip the preference around and let the last child device win once again. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jani Nikula Tested-by: Masami Ichikawa Tested-by: Torsten Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111966 Fixes: 36a0f92020dc ("drm/i915/bios: make child device order the priority order") Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191011202030.8829-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Acked-by: Jani Nikula --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c index 9628b485b1793..f0307b04cc130 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c @@ -1270,7 +1270,7 @@ static void sanitize_ddc_pin(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, DRM_DEBUG_KMS("port %c trying to use the same DDC pin (0x%x) as port %c, " "disabling port %c DVI/HDMI support\n", port_name(port), info->alternate_ddc_pin, - port_name(p), port_name(port)); + port_name(p), port_name(p)); /* * If we have multiple ports supposedly sharing the @@ -1278,9 +1278,14 @@ static void sanitize_ddc_pin(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, * port. Otherwise they share the same ddc bin and * system couldn't communicate with them separately. * - * Give child device order the priority, first come first - * served. + * Give inverse child device order the priority, + * last one wins. Yes, there are real machines + * (eg. Asrock B250M-HDV) where VBT has both + * port A and port E with the same AUX ch and + * we must pick port E :( */ + info = &dev_priv->vbt.ddi_port_info[p]; + info->supports_dvi = false; info->supports_hdmi = false; info->alternate_ddc_pin = 0; @@ -1316,7 +1321,7 @@ static void sanitize_aux_ch(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, DRM_DEBUG_KMS("port %c trying to use the same AUX CH (0x%x) as port %c, " "disabling port %c DP support\n", port_name(port), info->alternate_aux_channel, - port_name(p), port_name(port)); + port_name(p), port_name(p)); /* * If we have multiple ports supposedlt sharing the @@ -1324,9 +1329,14 @@ static void sanitize_aux_ch(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, * port. Otherwise they share the same aux channel * and system couldn't communicate with them separately. * - * Give child device order the priority, first come first - * served. + * Give inverse child device order the priority, + * last one wins. Yes, there are real machines + * (eg. Asrock B250M-HDV) where VBT has both + * port A and port E with the same AUX ch and + * we must pick port E :( */ + info = &dev_priv->vbt.ddi_port_info[p]; + info->supports_dp = false; info->alternate_aux_channel = 0; }