From: Jan Beulich Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 16:13:42 +0000 (+0200) Subject: xen-pciback: redo VF placement in the virtual topology X-Git-Url: http://git.maquefel.me/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4ba50e7c423c29639878c00573288869aa627068;p=linux.git xen-pciback: redo VF placement in the virtual topology The commit referenced below was incomplete: It merely affected what would get written to the vdev- xenstore node. The guest would still find the function at the original function number as long as __xen_pcibk_get_pci_dev() wouldn't be in sync. The same goes for AER wrt __xen_pcibk_get_pcifront_dev(). Undo overriding the function to zero and instead make sure that VFs at function zero remain alone in their slot. This has the added benefit of improving overall capacity, considering that there's only a total of 32 slots available right now (PCI segment and bus can both only ever be zero at present). Fixes: 8a5248fe10b1 ("xen PV passthru: assign SR-IOV virtual functions to separate virtual slots") Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8def783b-404c-3452-196d-3f3fd4d72c9e@suse.com Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross --- diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/vpci.c b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/vpci.c index 4162d0e7e00d7..cc7450f2b2a93 100644 --- a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/vpci.c +++ b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/vpci.c @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static int __xen_pcibk_add_pci_dev(struct xen_pcibk_device *pdev, struct pci_dev *dev, int devid, publish_pci_dev_cb publish_cb) { - int err = 0, slot, func = -1; + int err = 0, slot, func = PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn); struct pci_dev_entry *t, *dev_entry; struct vpci_dev_data *vpci_dev = pdev->pci_dev_data; @@ -95,22 +95,25 @@ static int __xen_pcibk_add_pci_dev(struct xen_pcibk_device *pdev, /* * Keep multi-function devices together on the virtual PCI bus, except - * virtual functions. + * that we want to keep virtual functions at func 0 on their own. They + * aren't multi-function devices and hence their presence at func 0 + * may cause guests to not scan the other functions. */ - if (!dev->is_virtfn) { + if (!dev->is_virtfn || func) { for (slot = 0; slot < PCI_SLOT_MAX; slot++) { if (list_empty(&vpci_dev->dev_list[slot])) continue; t = list_entry(list_first(&vpci_dev->dev_list[slot]), struct pci_dev_entry, list); + if (t->dev->is_virtfn && !PCI_FUNC(t->dev->devfn)) + continue; if (match_slot(dev, t->dev)) { dev_info(&dev->dev, "vpci: assign to virtual slot %d func %d\n", - slot, PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn)); + slot, func); list_add_tail(&dev_entry->list, &vpci_dev->dev_list[slot]); - func = PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn); goto unlock; } } @@ -123,7 +126,6 @@ static int __xen_pcibk_add_pci_dev(struct xen_pcibk_device *pdev, slot); list_add_tail(&dev_entry->list, &vpci_dev->dev_list[slot]); - func = dev->is_virtfn ? 0 : PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn); goto unlock; } }