From: SeongJae Park Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2023 17:15:29 +0000 (+0000) Subject: mm/damon/core-test: test damon_split_region_at()'s access rate copying X-Git-Url: http://git.maquefel.me/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=50668b53f8c9cdb2f6a7f7e3ff0a5d0bd85cc932;p=linux.git mm/damon/core-test: test damon_split_region_at()'s access rate copying damon_split_region_at() should set access rate related fields of the resulting regions same. It may forgotten, and actually there was the mistake before. Test it with the unit test case for the function. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231119171529.66863-2-sj@kernel.org Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park Cc: Brendan Higgins Cc: David Gow Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- diff --git a/mm/damon/core-test.h b/mm/damon/core-test.h index 649adf91ebc5a..e6a01ea2ec54b 100644 --- a/mm/damon/core-test.h +++ b/mm/damon/core-test.h @@ -122,18 +122,25 @@ static void damon_test_split_at(struct kunit *test) { struct damon_ctx *c = damon_new_ctx(); struct damon_target *t; - struct damon_region *r; + struct damon_region *r, *r_new; t = damon_new_target(); r = damon_new_region(0, 100); + r->nr_accesses_bp = 420000; + r->nr_accesses = 42; + r->last_nr_accesses = 15; damon_add_region(r, t); damon_split_region_at(t, r, 25); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, 0ul); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, 25ul); - r = damon_next_region(r); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, 25ul); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, 100ul); + r_new = damon_next_region(r); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r_new->ar.start, 25ul); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r_new->ar.end, 100ul); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->nr_accesses_bp, r_new->nr_accesses_bp); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->nr_accesses, r_new->nr_accesses); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->last_nr_accesses, r_new->last_nr_accesses); damon_free_target(t); damon_destroy_ctx(c);