From: Schspa Shi Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 03:02:51 +0000 (+0800) Subject: cpufreq: make interface functions and lock holding state clear X-Git-Url: http://git.maquefel.me/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=514ff1bcd98d7f57361025e2200b803d3ddde6c8;p=linux.git cpufreq: make interface functions and lock holding state clear cpufreq_offline() calls offline() and exit() under the policy rwsem But they are called outside the rwsem in cpufreq_online(). Make cpufreq_online() call offline() and exit() as well as online() and init() under the policy rwsem to achieve a clear lock relationship. All of the init() and online() implementations in the tree only initialize the policy object without attempting to acquire the policy rwsem and they won't call cpufreq APIs attempting to acquire it. Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi Acked-by: Viresh Kumar [ rjw: Changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index f75197b924ef2..2cad427741647 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -1341,12 +1341,12 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu) down_write(&policy->rwsem); policy->cpu = cpu; policy->governor = NULL; - up_write(&policy->rwsem); } else { new_policy = true; policy = cpufreq_policy_alloc(cpu); if (!policy) return -ENOMEM; + down_write(&policy->rwsem); } if (!new_policy && cpufreq_driver->online) { @@ -1386,7 +1386,6 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu) cpumask_copy(policy->related_cpus, policy->cpus); } - down_write(&policy->rwsem); /* * affected cpus must always be the one, which are online. We aren't * managing offline cpus here. @@ -1538,7 +1537,6 @@ out_destroy_policy: remove_cpu_dev_symlink(policy, j, get_cpu_device(j)); cpumask_clear(policy->cpus); - up_write(&policy->rwsem); out_offline_policy: if (cpufreq_driver->offline) @@ -1549,6 +1547,8 @@ out_exit_policy: cpufreq_driver->exit(policy); out_free_policy: + up_write(&policy->rwsem); + cpufreq_policy_free(policy); return ret; }