From: Luís Henriques Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 15:23:41 +0000 (+0100) Subject: fs: simplify misleading code to remove ambiguity regarding ihold()/iput() X-Git-Url: http://git.maquefel.me/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=6036c5f1317526890925576f0efcbc427a32a2ae;p=linux.git fs: simplify misleading code to remove ambiguity regarding ihold()/iput() Because 'inode' is being initialised before checking if 'dentry' is negative it looks like an extra iput() on 'inode' may happen since the ihold() is done only if the dentry is *not* negative. In reality this doesn't happen because d_is_negative() is never true if ->d_inode is NULL. This patch only makes the code easier to understand, as I was initially mislead by it. Signed-off-by: Luís Henriques Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230928152341.303-1-lhenriques@suse.de Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner --- diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c index 94b27370f468c..c36ff6f8195ad 100644 --- a/fs/namei.c +++ b/fs/namei.c @@ -4367,11 +4367,9 @@ retry_deleg: if (!IS_ERR(dentry)) { /* Why not before? Because we want correct error value */ - if (last.name[last.len]) + if (last.name[last.len] || d_is_negative(dentry)) goto slashes; inode = dentry->d_inode; - if (d_is_negative(dentry)) - goto slashes; ihold(inode); error = security_path_unlink(&path, dentry); if (error)