From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2022 02:11:43 +0000 (+0900) Subject: tracing/fprobe: Fix to check whether fprobe is registered correctly X-Git-Url: http://git.maquefel.me/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=61b304b73ab4b48b1cd7796efe42a570e2a0e0fc;p=linux.git tracing/fprobe: Fix to check whether fprobe is registered correctly Since commit ab51e15d535e ("fprobe: Introduce FPROBE_FL_KPROBE_SHARED flag for fprobe") introduced fprobe_kprobe_handler() for fprobe::ops::func, unregister_fprobe() fails to unregister the registered if user specifies FPROBE_FL_KPROBE_SHARED flag. Moreover, __register_ftrace_function() is possible to change the ftrace_ops::func, thus we have to check fprobe::ops::saved_func instead. To check it correctly, it should confirm the fprobe::ops::saved_func is either fprobe_handler() or fprobe_kprobe_handler(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/166677683946.1459107.15997653945538644683.stgit@devnote3/ Fixes: cad9931f64dc ("fprobe: Add ftrace based probe APIs") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) --- diff --git a/kernel/trace/fprobe.c b/kernel/trace/fprobe.c index 71614b2a67ff3..e8143e3680744 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/fprobe.c +++ b/kernel/trace/fprobe.c @@ -303,7 +303,8 @@ int unregister_fprobe(struct fprobe *fp) { int ret; - if (!fp || fp->ops.func != fprobe_handler) + if (!fp || (fp->ops.saved_func != fprobe_handler && + fp->ops.saved_func != fprobe_kprobe_handler)) return -EINVAL; /*