From: Andrew Jones Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2023 14:19:09 +0000 (+0100) Subject: RISC-V: hwprobe: Always use u64 for extension bits X-Git-Url: http://git.maquefel.me/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=777c0d761be7d981a2ae5494dfbc636311908dfb;p=linux.git RISC-V: hwprobe: Always use u64 for extension bits Extensions are getting added quickly and their hwprobe bits will soon exceed 31 (which pair values accommodate, since they're of type u64). However, in one tree, where a bunch of extensions got merged prior to zicboz, zicboz already got pushed to bit 32. Pushing it exposed a 32-bit compilation bug, since unsigned long was used instead of u64. Reported-by: kernel test robot Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310311801.hxduISrr-lkp@intel.com/ Fixes: 9c7646d5ffd2 ("RISC-V: hwprobe: Expose Zicboz extension and its block size") Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231101141908.192198-2-ajones@ventanamicro.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt --- diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c index c712037dbe10e..a2ca5b7756a5b 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ static void hwprobe_isa_ext0(struct riscv_hwprobe *pair, pair->value &= ~missing; } -static bool hwprobe_ext0_has(const struct cpumask *cpus, unsigned long ext) +static bool hwprobe_ext0_has(const struct cpumask *cpus, u64 ext) { struct riscv_hwprobe pair;