From: Christian Loehle Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 15:18:20 +0000 (+0000) Subject: sched/fair: Remove stale FREQUENCY_UTIL comment X-Git-Url: http://git.maquefel.me/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7cb7fb5b49399fc59f1c44686d82c0df0776c8c6;p=linux.git sched/fair: Remove stale FREQUENCY_UTIL comment On 05/03/2024 15:05, Vincent Guittot wrote: I'm fine with either and that was my first thought here, too, but it did seem like the comment was mostly placed there to justify the 'unexpected' high utilization when explicitly passing FREQUENCY_UTIL and the need to clamp it then. So removing did feel slightly more natural to me anyway. So alternatively: From: Christian Loehle Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 09:34:41 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] sched/fair: Remove stale FREQUENCY_UTIL mention effective_cpu_util() flags were removed, so remove mentioning of the flag. commit 9c0b4bb7f6303 ("sched/cpufreq: Rework schedutil governor performance estimation") reworked effective_cpu_util() removing enum cpu_util_type. Modify the comment accordingly. Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0e2833ee-0939-44e0-82a2-520a585a0153@arm.com --- diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 900978741a81c..9744b5036dd8e 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -7900,8 +7900,8 @@ eenv_pd_max_util(struct energy_env *eenv, struct cpumask *pd_cpus, * Performance domain frequency: utilization clamping * must be considered since it affects the selection * of the performance domain frequency. - * NOTE: in case RT tasks are running, by default the - * FREQUENCY_UTIL's utilization can be max OPP. + * NOTE: in case RT tasks are running, by default the min + * utilization can be max OPP. */ eff_util = effective_cpu_util(cpu, util, &min, &max);