From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2019 00:47:38 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: x86/timer: Don't inline __const_udelay()
X-Git-Url: http://git.maquefel.me/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=81423c37415fe45057d64196ae0ce8e17a9c7148;p=linux.git

x86/timer: Don't inline __const_udelay()

LTO will happily inline __const_udelay() everywhere it is used.  Forcing it
noinline saves ~44k text in a LTO build.

13999560        1740864 1499136 17239560        1070e08 vmlinux-with-udelay-inline
13954764        1736768 1499136 17190668        1064f0c vmlinux-wo-udelay-inline

Even without LTO this function should never be inlined.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190330004743.29541-4-andi@firstfloor.org
---

diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/delay.c b/arch/x86/lib/delay.c
index f5b7f1b3b6d75..b7375dc6898f3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/delay.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/delay.c
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ void __delay(unsigned long loops)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__delay);
 
-void __const_udelay(unsigned long xloops)
+noinline void __const_udelay(unsigned long xloops)
 {
 	unsigned long lpj = this_cpu_read(cpu_info.loops_per_jiffy) ? : loops_per_jiffy;
 	int d0;