From: Hao Xu Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2022 09:52:41 +0000 (+0800) Subject: io-wq: use IO_WQ_ACCT_NR rather than hardcoded number X-Git-Url: http://git.maquefel.me/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=86127bb18aea7e553cfd0842bcd33a6dc80bfbc8;p=linux.git io-wq: use IO_WQ_ACCT_NR rather than hardcoded number It's better to use the defined enum stuff not the hardcoded number to define array. Signed-off-by: Hao Xu Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220206095241.121485-4-haoxu@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- diff --git a/fs/io-wq.c b/fs/io-wq.c index f7b7fa396fafc..5b93fa67d3464 100644 --- a/fs/io-wq.c +++ b/fs/io-wq.c @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ enum { */ struct io_wqe { raw_spinlock_t lock; - struct io_wqe_acct acct[2]; + struct io_wqe_acct acct[IO_WQ_ACCT_NR]; int node; @@ -1376,7 +1376,7 @@ int io_wq_max_workers(struct io_wq *wq, int *new_count) BUILD_BUG_ON((int) IO_WQ_ACCT_UNBOUND != (int) IO_WQ_UNBOUND); BUILD_BUG_ON((int) IO_WQ_ACCT_NR != 2); - for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < IO_WQ_ACCT_NR; i++) { if (new_count[i] > task_rlimit(current, RLIMIT_NPROC)) new_count[i] = task_rlimit(current, RLIMIT_NPROC); }