From: Matheus Ferst Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 12:53:55 +0000 (-0300) Subject: target/ppc: fix vbpermd in big endian hosts X-Git-Url: http://git.maquefel.me/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=8f7d41e0c9cdcb696df564100e77c81ef6a9d026;p=qemu.git target/ppc: fix vbpermd in big endian hosts The extract64 arguments are not endian dependent as they are only used for bitwise operations. The current behavior in little-endian hosts is correct; since the indexes in VRB are in PowerISA-ordering, we should always invert the value before calling extract64. Also, using the VsrD macro, we can have a single EXTRACT_BIT definition for big and little-endian with the correct behavior. Signed-off-by: Matheus Ferst Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson Message-Id: <20220601125355.1266165-1-matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza --- diff --git a/target/ppc/int_helper.c b/target/ppc/int_helper.c index 16357c0900..11871947bc 100644 --- a/target/ppc/int_helper.c +++ b/target/ppc/int_helper.c @@ -1413,14 +1413,13 @@ XXGENPCV(XXGENPCVDM, 8) #define VBPERMQ_INDEX(avr, i) ((avr)->u8[(i)]) #define VBPERMD_INDEX(i) (i) #define VBPERMQ_DW(index) (((index) & 0x40) != 0) -#define EXTRACT_BIT(avr, i, index) (extract64((avr)->u64[i], index, 1)) #else #define VBPERMQ_INDEX(avr, i) ((avr)->u8[15 - (i)]) #define VBPERMD_INDEX(i) (1 - i) #define VBPERMQ_DW(index) (((index) & 0x40) == 0) -#define EXTRACT_BIT(avr, i, index) \ - (extract64((avr)->u64[1 - i], 63 - index, 1)) #endif +#define EXTRACT_BIT(avr, i, index) \ + (extract64((avr)->VsrD(i), 63 - index, 1)) void helper_vbpermd(ppc_avr_t *r, ppc_avr_t *a, ppc_avr_t *b) {