From: Jakub Kicinski Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 02:11:08 +0000 (-0700) Subject: Merge branch 'introduce-ndo_hwtstamp_get-and-ndo_hwtstamp_set' X-Git-Url: http://git.maquefel.me/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=b23ec2bd7b847aa8e453d8bb5f62d31176b535f3;p=linux.git Merge branch 'introduce-ndo_hwtstamp_get-and-ndo_hwtstamp_set' Vladimir Oltean says: ==================== Introduce ndo_hwtstamp_get() and ndo_hwtstamp_set() Based on previous RFCs from Maxim Georgiev: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230502043150.17097-1-glipus@gmail.com/ this series attempts to introduce new API for the hardware timestamping control path (SIOCGHWTSTAMP and SIOCSHWTSTAMP handling). I don't have any board with phylib hardware timestamping, so I would appreciate testing (especially on lan966x, the most intricate conversion). I was, however, able to test netdev level timestamping, because I also have some more unsubmitted conversions in progress: https://github.com/vladimiroltean/linux/commits/ndo-hwtstamp-v9 I hope that the concerns expressed in the comments of previous series were addressed, and that Köry Maincent's series: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230406173308.401924-1-kory.maincent@bootlin.com/ can make progress in parallel with the conversion of the rest of drivers. ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230801142824.1772134-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski --- b23ec2bd7b847aa8e453d8bb5f62d31176b535f3