From: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 15:59:44 +0000 (+0800)
Subject: perf/arm_cspmu: Avoid placing cpumask on the stack
X-Git-Url: http://git.maquefel.me/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=b5310fa1fe8e29e82dd88ef23e2f04ac533548e1;p=linux.git

perf/arm_cspmu: Avoid placing cpumask on the stack

In general it's preferable to avoid placing cpumasks on the stack, as
for large values of NR_CPUS these can consume significant amounts of
stack space and make stack overflows more likely.

Use cpumask_any_and_but() to avoid the need for a temporary cpumask on
the stack.

Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240403155950.2068109-5-dawei.li@shingroup.cn
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---

diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
index b9a252272f1e9..fd10042516650 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
@@ -1322,8 +1322,7 @@ static int arm_cspmu_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
 
 static int arm_cspmu_cpu_teardown(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
 {
-	int dst;
-	struct cpumask online_supported;
+	unsigned int dst;
 
 	struct arm_cspmu *cspmu =
 		hlist_entry_safe(node, struct arm_cspmu, cpuhp_node);
@@ -1333,9 +1332,8 @@ static int arm_cspmu_cpu_teardown(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
 		return 0;
 
 	/* Choose a new CPU to migrate ownership of the PMU to */
-	cpumask_and(&online_supported, &cspmu->associated_cpus,
-		    cpu_online_mask);
-	dst = cpumask_any_but(&online_supported, cpu);
+	dst = cpumask_any_and_but(&cspmu->associated_cpus,
+				  cpu_online_mask, cpu);
 	if (dst >= nr_cpu_ids)
 		return 0;