From: Shenming Lu Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 06:01:54 +0000 (+0800) Subject: irqchip/gic-v3-its: Drop the setting of PTZ altogether X-Git-Url: http://git.maquefel.me/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c21bc068cdbe5613d3319ae171c3f2eb9f321352;p=linux.git irqchip/gic-v3-its: Drop the setting of PTZ altogether GICv4.1 gives a way to get the VLPI state, which needs to map the vPE first, and after the state read, we may remap the vPE back while the VPT is not empty. So we can't assume that the VPT is empty at the first map. Besides, the optimization of PTZ is probably limited since the HW should be fairly efficient to parse the empty VPT. Let's drop the setting of PTZ altogether. Signed-off-by: Shenming Lu Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210322060158.1584-3-lushenming@huawei.com --- diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c index 4eb907f65bd05..d205fafede37a 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c @@ -794,8 +794,13 @@ static struct its_vpe *its_build_vmapp_cmd(struct its_node *its, its_encode_alloc(cmd, alloc); - /* We can only signal PTZ when alloc==1. Why do we have two bits? */ - its_encode_ptz(cmd, alloc); + /* + * GICv4.1 provides a way to get the VLPI state, which needs the vPE + * to be unmapped first, and in this case, we may remap the vPE + * back while the VPT is not empty. So we can't assume that the + * VPT is empty on map. This is why we never advertise PTZ. + */ + its_encode_ptz(cmd, false); its_encode_vconf_addr(cmd, vconf_addr); its_encode_vmapp_default_db(cmd, desc->its_vmapp_cmd.vpe->vpe_db_lpi);