From: Quanfa Fu Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 23:52:42 +0000 (+0900) Subject: tracing/eprobe: no need to check for negative ret value for snprintf X-Git-Url: http://git.maquefel.me/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c96abaec78f34366b3ddf1c6be52ca5c1241e15b;p=linux.git tracing/eprobe: no need to check for negative ret value for snprintf No need to check for negative return value from snprintf() as the code does not return negative values. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230109040625.3259642-1-quanfafu@gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Quanfa Fu Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) --- diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_eprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_eprobe.c index 352b65e2b9105..594ac1d086aa3 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_eprobe.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_eprobe.c @@ -923,17 +923,13 @@ static int trace_eprobe_parse_filter(struct trace_eprobe *ep, int argc, const ch p = ep->filter_str; for (i = 0; i < argc; i++) { - ret = snprintf(p, len, "%s ", argv[i]); - if (ret < 0) - goto error; - if (ret > len) { - ret = -E2BIG; - goto error; - } + if (i) + ret = snprintf(p, len, " %s", argv[i]); + else + ret = snprintf(p, len, "%s", argv[i]); p += ret; len -= ret; } - p[-1] = '\0'; /* * Ensure the filter string can be parsed correctly. Note, this