From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 07:40:33 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: s390/mm,fault: use pr_warn_ratelimited()
X-Git-Url: http://git.maquefel.me/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c9b611bf6e576aa1a03ac097b74322af56cb7052;p=linux.git

s390/mm,fault: use pr_warn_ratelimited()

Use pr_warn_ratelimited() instead of printk_ratelimited().

checkpatch reports:

WARNING: Prefer ... pr_warn_ratelimited(...  to printk_ratelimited(KERN_WARNING ...
+       printk_ratelimited(KERN_WARNING

Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
---

diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
index d22a8fe5e4fcc..dcea87f9ef683 100644
--- a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
@@ -661,9 +661,8 @@ void do_secure_storage_violation(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	 * This exception is only triggered when a guest 2 is running
 	 * and can therefore never occur in kernel context.
 	 */
-	printk_ratelimited(KERN_WARNING
-			   "Secure storage violation in task: %s, pid %d\n",
-			   current->comm, current->pid);
+	pr_warn_ratelimited("Secure storage violation in task: %s, pid %d\n",
+			    current->comm, current->pid);
 	send_sig(SIGSEGV, current, 0);
 }