From: Pieter Jansen van Vuuren Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 09:36:38 +0000 (+0100) Subject: sfc: handle VI shortage on ef100 by readjusting the channels X-Git-Url: http://git.maquefel.me/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=ca7d05007d0a95615a51cb5a624775db8c450f43;p=linux.git sfc: handle VI shortage on ef100 by readjusting the channels When fewer VIs are allocated than what is allowed we can readjust the channels by calling efx_mcdi_alloc_vis() again. Signed-off-by: Pieter Jansen van Vuuren Reviewed-by: Martin Habets Reviewed-by: Simon Horman Reviewed-by: Edward Cree Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_netdev.c index be395cd8770bc..274f3a2562ad1 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_netdev.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_netdev.c @@ -40,19 +40,26 @@ static int ef100_alloc_vis(struct efx_nic *efx, unsigned int *allocated_vis) unsigned int tx_vis = efx->n_tx_channels + efx->n_extra_tx_channels; unsigned int rx_vis = efx->n_rx_channels; unsigned int min_vis, max_vis; + int rc; EFX_WARN_ON_PARANOID(efx->tx_queues_per_channel != 1); tx_vis += efx->n_xdp_channels * efx->xdp_tx_per_channel; max_vis = max(rx_vis, tx_vis); - /* Currently don't handle resource starvation and only accept - * our maximum needs and no less. + /* We require at least a single complete TX channel worth of queues. */ + min_vis = efx->tx_queues_per_channel; + + rc = efx_mcdi_alloc_vis(efx, min_vis, max_vis, + NULL, allocated_vis); + + /* We retry allocating VIs by reallocating channels when we have not + * been able to allocate the maximum VIs. */ - min_vis = max_vis; + if (!rc && *allocated_vis < max_vis) + rc = -EAGAIN; - return efx_mcdi_alloc_vis(efx, min_vis, max_vis, - NULL, allocated_vis); + return rc; } static int ef100_remap_bar(struct efx_nic *efx, int max_vis) @@ -133,9 +140,41 @@ static int ef100_net_open(struct net_device *net_dev) goto fail; rc = ef100_alloc_vis(efx, &allocated_vis); - if (rc) + if (rc && rc != -EAGAIN) goto fail; + /* Try one more time but with the maximum number of channels + * equal to the allocated VIs, which would more likely succeed. + */ + if (rc == -EAGAIN) { + rc = efx_mcdi_free_vis(efx); + if (rc) + goto fail; + + efx_remove_interrupts(efx); + efx->max_channels = allocated_vis; + + rc = efx_probe_interrupts(efx); + if (rc) + goto fail; + + rc = efx_set_channels(efx); + if (rc) + goto fail; + + rc = ef100_alloc_vis(efx, &allocated_vis); + if (rc && rc != -EAGAIN) + goto fail; + + /* It should be very unlikely that we failed here again, but in + * such a case we return ENOSPC. + */ + if (rc == -EAGAIN) { + rc = -ENOSPC; + goto fail; + } + } + rc = efx_probe_channels(efx); if (rc) return rc;