From: Frederic Weisbecker Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 22:55:02 +0000 (+0100) Subject: tick: Assume the tick can't be stopped in NOHZ_MODE_INACTIVE mode X-Git-Url: http://git.maquefel.me/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=d9b1865c86aec7c515db5718e4820106c2c12db3;p=linux.git tick: Assume the tick can't be stopped in NOHZ_MODE_INACTIVE mode The full-nohz update function checks if the nohz mode is active before proceeding. It considers one exception though: if the tick is already stopped even though the nohz mode is inactive, it still moves on in order to update/restart the tick if needed. However in order for the tick to be stopped, the nohz_mode has to be either NOHZ_MODE_LOWRES or NOHZ_MODE_HIGHRES. Therefore it doesn't make sense to test if the tick is stopped before verifying NOHZ_MODE_INACTIVE mode. Remove the needless related condition. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240225225508.11587-11-frederic@kernel.org --- diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c index b17895de26b9f..b79f5403433bd 100644 --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c @@ -1086,7 +1086,7 @@ static void tick_nohz_full_update_tick(struct tick_sched *ts) if (!tick_nohz_full_cpu(smp_processor_id())) return; - if (!ts->tick_stopped && ts->nohz_mode == NOHZ_MODE_INACTIVE) + if (ts->nohz_mode == NOHZ_MODE_INACTIVE) return; __tick_nohz_full_update_tick(ts, ktime_get());