From: Rae Moar Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 20:39:50 +0000 (+0000) Subject: kunit: fix bug in KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ X-Git-Url: http://git.maquefel.me/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=dd2f0a0a2f751b7aafaea5cbba8e65a55fd12f94;p=linux.git kunit: fix bug in KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ In KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ and KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMNEQ, add check if one of the inputs is NULL and fail if this is the case. Currently, the kernel crashes if one of the inputs is NULL. Instead, fail the test and add an appropriate error message. Fixes: b8a926bea8b1 ("kunit: Introduce KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ and KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMNEQ macros") This was found by the kernel test robot: https://lore.kernel.org/all/202212191448.D6EDPdOh-lkp@intel.com/ Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: Rae Moar Reviewed-by: David Gow Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan --- diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index 87ea90576b507..a20bff149bdf3 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -683,8 +683,9 @@ do { \ .right_text = #right, \ }; \ \ - if (likely(memcmp(__left, __right, __size) op 0)) \ - break; \ + if (likely(__left && __right)) \ + if (likely(memcmp(__left, __right, __size) op 0)) \ + break; \ \ _KUNIT_FAILED(test, \ assert_type, \ diff --git a/lib/kunit/assert.c b/lib/kunit/assert.c index f5b50babe38d4..05a09652f5a10 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/assert.c +++ b/lib/kunit/assert.c @@ -241,24 +241,34 @@ void kunit_mem_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, mem_assert = container_of(assert, struct kunit_mem_assert, assert); - string_stream_add(stream, - KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "Expected %s %s %s, but\n", - mem_assert->text->left_text, - mem_assert->text->operation, - mem_assert->text->right_text); + if (!mem_assert->left_value) { + string_stream_add(stream, + KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "Expected %s is not null, but is\n", + mem_assert->text->left_text); + } else if (!mem_assert->right_value) { + string_stream_add(stream, + KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "Expected %s is not null, but is\n", + mem_assert->text->right_text); + } else { + string_stream_add(stream, + KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "Expected %s %s %s, but\n", + mem_assert->text->left_text, + mem_assert->text->operation, + mem_assert->text->right_text); - string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s ==\n", - mem_assert->text->left_text); - kunit_assert_hexdump(stream, mem_assert->left_value, - mem_assert->right_value, mem_assert->size); + string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s ==\n", + mem_assert->text->left_text); + kunit_assert_hexdump(stream, mem_assert->left_value, + mem_assert->right_value, mem_assert->size); - string_stream_add(stream, "\n"); + string_stream_add(stream, "\n"); - string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s ==\n", - mem_assert->text->right_text); - kunit_assert_hexdump(stream, mem_assert->right_value, - mem_assert->left_value, mem_assert->size); + string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s ==\n", + mem_assert->text->right_text); + kunit_assert_hexdump(stream, mem_assert->right_value, + mem_assert->left_value, mem_assert->size); - kunit_assert_print_msg(message, stream); + kunit_assert_print_msg(message, stream); + } } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_mem_assert_format);