From: Paul E. McKenney Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 23:27:40 +0000 (-0800) Subject: rcutorture/formal: Replace synchronize_sched() with synchronize_rcu() X-Git-Url: http://git.maquefel.me/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=df56e0f960627f606cfc6ccda25c6ab5c61953d5;p=linux.git rcutorture/formal: Replace synchronize_sched() with synchronize_rcu() Now that synchronize_rcu() waits for preempt-disable regions of code as well as RCU read-side critical sections, synchronize_sched() can be replaced by synchronize_rcu(). This commit therefore makes this change, even though it is but a comment. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney --- diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/formal/srcu-cbmc/include/linux/types.h b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/formal/srcu-cbmc/include/linux/types.h index 891ad13e95b2d..d27285f8ee82d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/formal/srcu-cbmc/include/linux/types.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/formal/srcu-cbmc/include/linux/types.h @@ -131,8 +131,8 @@ struct hlist_node { * weird ABI and we need to ask it explicitly. * * The alignment is required to guarantee that bits 0 and 1 of @next will be - * clear under normal conditions -- as long as we use call_rcu(), - * call_rcu_bh(), call_rcu_sched(), or call_srcu() to queue callback. + * clear under normal conditions -- as long as we use call_rcu() or + * call_srcu() to queue callback. * * This guarantee is important for few reasons: * - future call_rcu_lazy() will make use of lower bits in the pointer;