From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 21:10:58 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: coverity/s390x: avoid false positive in kvm_irqchip_add_adapter_route
X-Git-Url: http://git.maquefel.me/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e9af2fef242ce92f86d3d5c1a94c3199ff1e24c9;p=qemu.git

coverity/s390x: avoid false positive in kvm_irqchip_add_adapter_route

Paolo Bonzini reported that Coverity reports an uninitialized pad value.
Let's use a designated initializer for kvm_irq_routing_entry to avoid
this false positive. This is similar to kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route and
other users of kvm_irq_routing_entry.

Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---

diff --git a/kvm-all.c b/kvm-all.c
index 4bfecccf8e..18cc6b4d3d 100644
--- a/kvm-all.c
+++ b/kvm-all.c
@@ -1277,7 +1277,7 @@ static int kvm_irqchip_assign_irqfd(KVMState *s, int fd, int rfd, int virq,
 
 int kvm_irqchip_add_adapter_route(KVMState *s, AdapterInfo *adapter)
 {
-    struct kvm_irq_routing_entry kroute;
+    struct kvm_irq_routing_entry kroute = {};
     int virq;
 
     if (!kvm_gsi_routing_enabled()) {