From: Uwe Kleine-König Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:32:18 +0000 (+0200) Subject: pwm: tiecap: Drop .free() callback X-Git-Url: http://git.maquefel.me/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=ec67fba92ebf6249b8155613063e403c695696c6;p=linux.git pwm: tiecap: Drop .free() callback ecap_pwm_free is only called when a consumer releases the PWM (using pwm_put() or pwm_free()). The consumer is expected to disable the PWM before doing that. It's not clear if a warning about that is justified, but if it is this is independent of the actual driver and can better be done in the core. Also if there is a good reason it's wrong to disable the hardware and so the call to pm_runtime_put_sync() should be dropped. Moreover there is no matching pwm_runtime_get call and so the runtime usage counter might become negative. Fixes: 8e0cb05b3b75 ("pwm: pwm-tiecap: PWM driver support for ECAP APWM") Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding --- diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-tiecap.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-tiecap.c index f40975fcb195a..027dd01425584 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-tiecap.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-tiecap.c @@ -168,16 +168,7 @@ static void ecap_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm) pm_runtime_put_sync(pc->chip.dev); } -static void ecap_pwm_free(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm) -{ - if (pwm_is_enabled(pwm)) { - dev_warn(chip->dev, "Removing PWM device without disabling\n"); - pm_runtime_put_sync(chip->dev); - } -} - static const struct pwm_ops ecap_pwm_ops = { - .free = ecap_pwm_free, .config = ecap_pwm_config, .set_polarity = ecap_pwm_set_polarity, .enable = ecap_pwm_enable,