From 00c611def8748a0a1cf1d31842e49b42dfdb3de1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 16:21:08 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Revert "ACPI 2.0 / AML: Improve module level execution by moving the If/Else/While execution to per-table basis" Revert commit 3d4b7ae96d81 (ACPI 2.0 / AML: Improve module level execution by moving the If/Else/While execution to per-table basis) that enabled the execution of module-level AML after loading each table (rather than after all AML tables have been loaded), but overlooked locking issues resulting from that change. Fixes: 3d4b7ae96d81 (ACPI 2.0 / AML: Improve module level execution by moving the If/Else/While execution to per-table basis) Reported-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> --- include/acpi/acpixf.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/acpi/acpixf.h b/include/acpi/acpixf.h index 4e4c21491c418..1ff3a76c265db 100644 --- a/include/acpi/acpixf.h +++ b/include/acpi/acpixf.h @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ ACPI_INIT_GLOBAL(u8, acpi_gbl_do_not_use_xsdt, FALSE); /* * Optionally support group module level code. */ -ACPI_INIT_GLOBAL(u8, acpi_gbl_group_module_level_code, FALSE); +ACPI_INIT_GLOBAL(u8, acpi_gbl_group_module_level_code, TRUE); /* * Optionally use 32-bit FADT addresses if and when there is a conflict -- 2.30.2