From 09e6583b54b7cd126869d41908e28cd0e8f44e45 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: CismonX <admin@cismon.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 04:40:51 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Use off_t instead of loff_t

Since we're already enforcing 64-bit off_t, using loff_t
makes no difference.

Also loff_t is Linux-only, which breaks compatibility for *BSD.
---
 test/test_write_cache.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/test/test_write_cache.c b/test/test_write_cache.c
index 6b12a9d..cc827c7 100644
--- a/test/test_write_cache.c
+++ b/test/test_write_cache.c
@@ -9,8 +9,6 @@
 
 #define FUSE_USE_VERSION 30
 
-#define _GNU_SOURCE /* for loff_t */
-
 #include <fuse_config.h>
 #include <fuse_lowlevel.h>
 #include <stdio.h>
@@ -214,7 +212,7 @@ static void test_fs(char *mountpoint) {
     const size_t dsize = options.data_size * WRITE_SYSCALLS;
     int fd, rofd;
     pthread_t rofd_thread;
-    loff_t off = 0;
+    off_t off = 0;
 
     buf = malloc(dsize);
     assert(buf != NULL);
-- 
2.30.2