From 0d6b35283bcf1a379cf20066544af8e6a6b16b46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: NeilBrown Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 09:04:19 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] sched/core: Report correct state for TASK_IDLE | TASK_FREEZABLE task_state_index() ignores uninteresting state flags (such as TASK_FREEZABLE) for most states, but for TASK_IDLE and TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT it does not. So if a task is waiting TASK_IDLE|TASK_FREEZABLE it gets incorrectly reported as TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE or "D". (it is planned for nfsd to change to use this state). Fix this by only testing the interesting bits and not the irrelevant bits in __task_state_index() Signed-off-by: NeilBrown Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/169335025927.5133.4781141800413736103@noble.neil.brown.name --- include/linux/sched.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h index ae6fd76afaf56..77f01ac385f7a 100644 --- a/include/linux/sched.h +++ b/include/linux/sched.h @@ -1671,7 +1671,7 @@ static inline unsigned int __task_state_index(unsigned int tsk_state, BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(TASK_REPORT_MAX); - if (tsk_state == TASK_IDLE) + if ((tsk_state & TASK_IDLE) == TASK_IDLE) state = TASK_REPORT_IDLE; /* @@ -1679,7 +1679,7 @@ static inline unsigned int __task_state_index(unsigned int tsk_state, * to userspace, we can make this appear as if the task has gone through * a regular rt_mutex_lock() call. */ - if (tsk_state == TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT) + if (tsk_state & TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT) state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE; return fls(state); -- 2.30.2