From 2026f2062df860e5d282ffd4962ea5d5ed53dc51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 15:57:32 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Add pruning test case for bpf_spin_lock
Test that when reg->id is not same for the same register of type
PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE between current and old explored state, we currently
return false from regsafe and continue exploring.
Without the fix in prior commit, the test case fails.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221209135733.28851-7-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
---
.../selftests/bpf/verifier/spin_lock.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spin_lock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spin_lock.c
index 781621facae48..0a8dcfc37fc6e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spin_lock.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spin_lock.c
@@ -331,3 +331,42 @@
.errstr = "inside bpf_spin_lock",
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
},
+{
+ "spin_lock: regsafe compare reg->id for map value",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_6, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, -4, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -4),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_9),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -4),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_7),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_spin_lock),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_6, 0, 1),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_8),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_7),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_spin_unlock),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .fixup_map_spin_lock = { 2 },
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock",
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ .flags = BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ,
+},
--
2.30.2