From 26459343e0fac1ea4cb5192c490e3e519eed74dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 17:35:38 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove '& 0xffff' from the mask given to WA_REG() We may be hidding bugs by doing that, so let remove it and have the actual mask value shine through, for better or worse. Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c index ef05af02763a2..9f445e9a75d1a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c @@ -724,10 +724,10 @@ static int wa_add(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, } #define WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(addr, mask) \ - WA_REG(addr, (mask) & 0xffff, _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(mask)) + WA_REG(addr, (mask), _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(mask)) #define WA_CLR_BIT_MASKED(addr, mask) \ - WA_REG(addr, (mask) & 0xffff, _MASKED_BIT_DISABLE(mask)) + WA_REG(addr, (mask), _MASKED_BIT_DISABLE(mask)) #define WA_SET_FIELD_MASKED(addr, mask, value) \ WA_REG(addr, mask, _MASKED_FIELD(mask, value)) -- 2.30.2