From 28f3e0002aeaf9b02ace41551c92dc1c04f0de6e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 09:40:32 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] s390/mm,fault: use __ratelimit() instead of
printk_ratelimit()
Just like other architectures make use __ratelimit() instead of
printk_ratelimit().
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/mm/fault.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
index c13999aa05269..d22a8fe5e4fcc 100644
--- a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
@@ -218,11 +218,13 @@ int show_unhandled_signals = 1;
void report_user_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, long signr, int is_mm_fault)
{
+ static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
+
if ((task_pid_nr(current) > 1) && !show_unhandled_signals)
return;
if (!unhandled_signal(current, signr))
return;
- if (!printk_ratelimit())
+ if (!__ratelimit(&rs))
return;
printk(KERN_ALERT "User process fault: interruption code %04x ilc:%d ",
regs->int_code & 0xffff, regs->int_code >> 17);
--
2.30.2