From 670106eb4c8b23475f8c2b3416005a312afa622f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tyrel Datwyler Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 17:54:28 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] scsi: ibmvfc: Fix erroneous use of rtas_busy_delay with hcall return code Commit 0217a272fe13 ("scsi: ibmvfc: Store return code of H_FREE_SUB_CRQ during cleanup") wrongly changed the busy loop check to use rtas_busy_delay() instead of H_BUSY and H_IS_LONG_BUSY(). The busy return codes for RTAS and hypercalls are not the same. Fix this issue by restoring the use of H_BUSY and H_IS_LONG_BUSY(). Fixes: 0217a272fe13 ("scsi: ibmvfc: Store return code of H_FREE_SUB_CRQ during cleanup") Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230921225435.3537728-5-tyreld@linux.ibm.com Reviewed-by: Brian King Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen --- drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c index 2bfeeb9ace018..30baa046ae5b6 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ #include #include #include -#include #include #include #include @@ -5952,7 +5951,7 @@ static int ibmvfc_register_scsi_channel(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost, irq_failed: do { rc = plpar_hcall_norets(H_FREE_SUB_CRQ, vdev->unit_address, scrq->cookie); - } while (rtas_busy_delay(rc)); + } while (rc == H_BUSY || H_IS_LONG_BUSY(rc)); reg_failed: LEAVE; return rc; -- 2.30.2