From 6a9a52f74e3b82ff3f5398810c1b23ad497e2df5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dawei Li Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 16:54:49 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1: Avoid explicit cpumask allocation on stack In general it's preferable to avoid placing cpumasks on the stack, as for large values of NR_CPUS these can consume significant amounts of stack space and make stack overflows more likely. Use cpumask_first_and_and() to avoid the need for a temporary cpumask on the stack. Signed-off-by: Dawei Li Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240416085454.3547175-3-dawei.li@shingroup.cn --- drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c index eb02d203c9634..90daa274ef239 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c @@ -192,14 +192,10 @@ static int bcm6345_l1_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, u32 mask = BIT(d->hwirq % IRQS_PER_WORD); unsigned int old_cpu = cpu_for_irq(intc, d); unsigned int new_cpu; - struct cpumask valid; unsigned long flags; bool enabled; - if (!cpumask_and(&valid, &intc->cpumask, dest)) - return -EINVAL; - - new_cpu = cpumask_any_and(&valid, cpu_online_mask); + new_cpu = cpumask_first_and_and(&intc->cpumask, dest, cpu_online_mask); if (new_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) return -EINVAL; -- 2.30.2