From 8639cc83aac5dd1a197ed05b8f717acc35bb0248 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Zhen Lei Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 19:48:51 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add and use static helper function arm_smmu_get_cmdq() One SMMU has only one normal CMDQ. Therefore, this CMDQ is used regardless of the core on which the command is inserted. It can be referenced directly through "smmu->cmdq". However, one SMMU has multiple ECMDQs, and the ECMDQ used by the core on which the command insertion is executed may be different. So the helper function arm_smmu_get_cmdq() is added, which returns the CMDQ/ECMDQ that the current core should use. Currently, the code that supports ECMDQ is not added. just simply returns "&smmu->cmdq". Many subfunctions of arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist() use "&smmu->cmdq" or "&smmu->cmdq.q" directly. To support ECMDQ, they need to call the newly added function arm_smmu_get_cmdq() instead. Note that normal CMDQ is still required until ECMDQ is available. Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210811114852.2429-4-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon --- drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 22 ++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c index 3cdb01f93f1b1..c1cd2adab3efd 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c @@ -335,10 +335,14 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(u64 *cmd, struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *ent) return 0; } +static struct arm_smmu_cmdq *arm_smmu_get_cmdq(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu) +{ + return &smmu->cmdq; +} + static void arm_smmu_cmdq_build_sync_cmd(u64 *cmd, struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, - u32 prod) + struct arm_smmu_queue *q, u32 prod) { - struct arm_smmu_queue *q = &smmu->cmdq.q; struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent ent = { .opcode = CMDQ_OP_CMD_SYNC, }; @@ -579,7 +583,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_not_full(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, { unsigned long flags; struct arm_smmu_queue_poll qp; - struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = &smmu->cmdq; + struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = arm_smmu_get_cmdq(smmu); int ret = 0; /* @@ -595,7 +599,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_not_full(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, queue_poll_init(smmu, &qp); do { - llq->val = READ_ONCE(smmu->cmdq.q.llq.val); + llq->val = READ_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.val); if (!queue_full(llq)) break; @@ -614,7 +618,7 @@ static int __arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_msi(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, { int ret = 0; struct arm_smmu_queue_poll qp; - struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = &smmu->cmdq; + struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = arm_smmu_get_cmdq(smmu); u32 *cmd = (u32 *)(Q_ENT(&cmdq->q, llq->prod)); queue_poll_init(smmu, &qp); @@ -637,12 +641,12 @@ static int __arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_consumed(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *llq) { struct arm_smmu_queue_poll qp; - struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = &smmu->cmdq; + struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = arm_smmu_get_cmdq(smmu); u32 prod = llq->prod; int ret = 0; queue_poll_init(smmu, &qp); - llq->val = READ_ONCE(smmu->cmdq.q.llq.val); + llq->val = READ_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.val); do { if (queue_consumed(llq, prod)) break; @@ -732,7 +736,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 prod; unsigned long flags; bool owner; - struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = &smmu->cmdq; + struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = arm_smmu_get_cmdq(smmu); struct arm_smmu_ll_queue llq, head; int ret = 0; @@ -772,7 +776,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, arm_smmu_cmdq_write_entries(cmdq, cmds, llq.prod, n); if (sync) { prod = queue_inc_prod_n(&llq, n); - arm_smmu_cmdq_build_sync_cmd(cmd_sync, smmu, prod); + arm_smmu_cmdq_build_sync_cmd(cmd_sync, smmu, &cmdq->q, prod); queue_write(Q_ENT(&cmdq->q, prod), cmd_sync, CMDQ_ENT_DWORDS); /* -- 2.30.2