From 8ab5059dc4f4c34325eba6270ef12a4ab1386019 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dan Carpenter Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 18:07:07 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Clean up a return statement in scmi_probe The comments say "enabled" where "disabled" is intended. Also it's cleaner to return zero explicitly instead of ret. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Y86im5M49p3ePGxj@kili Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla --- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c index d21c7eafd641c..703f16ef39530 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c @@ -2739,8 +2739,8 @@ static int scmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (ret) goto clear_dev_req_notifier; - /* Bail out anyway when coex enabled */ - return ret; + /* Bail out anyway when coex disabled. */ + return 0; } /* Coex enabled, carry on in any case. */ -- 2.30.2