From 9ba4611a3a7902c6bad70c5c205de5161fcfc17b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:26:26 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: Fix 32 bit compiles by using an unsigned long byte
count in the ordered extent
The ordered extents have to fit in memory, so an unsigned long is sufficient.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
---
fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h
index 36e63f1f79b30..199cb0b4f1d9a 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h
@@ -95,7 +95,8 @@ struct btrfs_ordered_extent {
* calculates the total size you need to allocate for an ordered sum
* structure spanning 'bytes' in the file
*/
-static inline int btrfs_ordered_sum_size(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 bytes)
+static inline int btrfs_ordered_sum_size(struct btrfs_root *root,
+ unsigned long bytes)
{
unsigned long num_sectors = (bytes + root->sectorsize - 1) /
root->sectorsize;
--
2.30.2