From 9c82ce59362672e0e5b38cff1e9dbdb52ec62b4f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Russell King Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 16:50:45 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] arm64/bpf: Remove 128MB limit for BPF JIT programs commit b89ddf4cca43f1269093942cf5c4e457fd45c335 upstream. Commit 91fc957c9b1d ("arm64/bpf: don't allocate BPF JIT programs in module memory") restricts BPF JIT program allocation to a 128MB region to ensure BPF programs are still in branching range of each other. However this restriction should not apply to the aarch64 JIT, since BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL are implemented as a 64-bit move into a register and then a BLR instruction - which has the effect of being able to call anything without proximity limitation. The practical reason to relax this restriction on JIT memory is that 128MB of JIT memory can be quickly exhausted, especially where PAGE_SIZE is 64KB - one page is needed per program. In cases where seccomp filters are applied to multiple VMs on VM launch - such filters are classic BPF but converted to BPF - this can severely limit the number of VMs that can be launched. In a world where we support BPF JIT always on, turning off the JIT isn't always an option either. Fixes: 91fc957c9b1d ("arm64/bpf: don't allocate BPF JIT programs in module memory") Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel Signed-off-by: Russell King Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Tested-by: Alan Maguire Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1636131046-5982-2-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com Reviewed-by: Tom Saeger Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/arm64/include/asm/extable.h | 9 --------- arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h | 5 +---- arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 2 +- arch/arm64/mm/extable.c | 13 +++++++++---- arch/arm64/mm/ptdump.c | 2 -- arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 7 ++----- 6 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/extable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/extable.h index b15eb4a3e6b20..840a35ed92ec8 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/extable.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/extable.h @@ -22,15 +22,6 @@ struct exception_table_entry #define ARCH_HAS_RELATIVE_EXTABLE -static inline bool in_bpf_jit(struct pt_regs *regs) -{ - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF_JIT)) - return false; - - return regs->pc >= BPF_JIT_REGION_START && - regs->pc < BPF_JIT_REGION_END; -} - #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_JIT int arm64_bpf_fixup_exception(const struct exception_table_entry *ex, struct pt_regs *regs); diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h index f1745a8434144..05886322c300c 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h @@ -44,11 +44,8 @@ #define _PAGE_OFFSET(va) (-(UL(1) << (va))) #define PAGE_OFFSET (_PAGE_OFFSET(VA_BITS)) #define KIMAGE_VADDR (MODULES_END) -#define BPF_JIT_REGION_START (_PAGE_END(VA_BITS_MIN)) -#define BPF_JIT_REGION_SIZE (SZ_128M) -#define BPF_JIT_REGION_END (BPF_JIT_REGION_START + BPF_JIT_REGION_SIZE) #define MODULES_END (MODULES_VADDR + MODULES_VSIZE) -#define MODULES_VADDR (BPF_JIT_REGION_END) +#define MODULES_VADDR (_PAGE_END(VA_BITS_MIN)) #define MODULES_VSIZE (SZ_128M) #define VMEMMAP_START (-(UL(1) << (VA_BITS - VMEMMAP_SHIFT))) #define VMEMMAP_END (VMEMMAP_START + VMEMMAP_SIZE) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c index b03e383d944ab..fe0cd0568813e 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c @@ -988,7 +988,7 @@ static struct break_hook bug_break_hook = { static int reserved_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr) { pr_err("%s generated an invalid instruction at %pS!\n", - in_bpf_jit(regs) ? "BPF JIT" : "Kernel text patching", + "Kernel text patching", (void *)instruction_pointer(regs)); /* We cannot handle this */ diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/extable.c b/arch/arm64/mm/extable.c index aa0060178343a..60a8b6a8a42b5 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/mm/extable.c +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/extable.c @@ -9,14 +9,19 @@ int fixup_exception(struct pt_regs *regs) { const struct exception_table_entry *fixup; + unsigned long addr; - fixup = search_exception_tables(instruction_pointer(regs)); - if (!fixup) - return 0; + addr = instruction_pointer(regs); - if (in_bpf_jit(regs)) + /* Search the BPF tables first, these are formatted differently */ + fixup = search_bpf_extables(addr); + if (fixup) return arm64_bpf_fixup_exception(fixup, regs); + fixup = search_exception_tables(addr); + if (!fixup) + return 0; + regs->pc = (unsigned long)&fixup->fixup + fixup->fixup; return 1; } diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/ptdump.c b/arch/arm64/mm/ptdump.c index 1c403536c9bb0..9bc4066c5bf33 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/mm/ptdump.c +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/ptdump.c @@ -41,8 +41,6 @@ static struct addr_marker address_markers[] = { { 0 /* KASAN_SHADOW_START */, "Kasan shadow start" }, { KASAN_SHADOW_END, "Kasan shadow end" }, #endif - { BPF_JIT_REGION_START, "BPF start" }, - { BPF_JIT_REGION_END, "BPF end" }, { MODULES_VADDR, "Modules start" }, { MODULES_END, "Modules end" }, { VMALLOC_START, "vmalloc() area" }, diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 803e7773fa869..465c44d0c72fc 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -1138,15 +1138,12 @@ out: u64 bpf_jit_alloc_exec_limit(void) { - return BPF_JIT_REGION_SIZE; + return VMALLOC_END - VMALLOC_START; } void *bpf_jit_alloc_exec(unsigned long size) { - return __vmalloc_node_range(size, PAGE_SIZE, BPF_JIT_REGION_START, - BPF_JIT_REGION_END, GFP_KERNEL, - PAGE_KERNEL, 0, NUMA_NO_NODE, - __builtin_return_address(0)); + return vmalloc(size); } void bpf_jit_free_exec(void *addr) -- 2.30.2