From a1458187ae66825871c93b6b56ca2cd1d88e9cb9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexandru Gheorghiu <gheorghiuandru@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 08:32:51 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI / acpi_pad: Used PTR_RET

Use PTR_RET instead of explicit checking with IS_ERR.

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghiu <gheorghiuandru@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
index 31de1043eea05..27bb6a91de5f6 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ static int create_power_saving_task(void)
 	ps_tsks[ps_tsk_num] = kthread_run(power_saving_thread,
 		(void *)(unsigned long)ps_tsk_num,
 		"acpi_pad/%d", ps_tsk_num);
-	rc = IS_ERR(ps_tsks[ps_tsk_num]) ? PTR_ERR(ps_tsks[ps_tsk_num]) : 0;
+	rc = PTR_RET(ps_tsks[ps_tsk_num]);
 	if (!rc)
 		ps_tsk_num++;
 	else
-- 
2.30.2