From bd45be9f5ffcaae68d2d0de2962cdc9fa20cb832 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Henderson Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:33:58 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] linux-user/s390x: Fix trace in restore_regs Directly reading sc->regs.psw.addr misses the bswap that may be performed by __get_user. Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand Message-Id: <20210428193408.233706-6-richard.henderson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier --- linux-user/s390x/signal.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/linux-user/s390x/signal.c b/linux-user/s390x/signal.c index e455a9818d..dcc6f7bc02 100644 --- a/linux-user/s390x/signal.c +++ b/linux-user/s390x/signal.c @@ -232,16 +232,17 @@ give_sigsegv: static void restore_sigregs(CPUS390XState *env, target_sigregs *sc) { + target_ulong prev_addr; int i; for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) { __get_user(env->regs[i], &sc->regs.gprs[i]); } + prev_addr = env->psw.addr; __get_user(env->psw.mask, &sc->regs.psw.mask); - trace_user_s390x_restore_sigregs(env, (unsigned long long)sc->regs.psw.addr, - (unsigned long long)env->psw.addr); __get_user(env->psw.addr, &sc->regs.psw.addr); + trace_user_s390x_restore_sigregs(env, env->psw.addr, prev_addr); for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) { __get_user(env->aregs[i], &sc->regs.acrs[i]); -- 2.30.2