From ccf9ff524ccb195d648ecb0b168340560b42532c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 11:49:16 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] x86_64: fix CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR build bug on x86_64, the CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR build fails if used in a distcc setup that has "CC" defined to "distcc gcc": gcc: gcc: linker input file unused because linking not done gcc: gcc: linker input file unused because linking not done gcc: gcc: linker input file unused because linking not done this is because the gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh script has a 2-parameters assumption. Fix this by passing $(CC) as a single parameter. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Please-Use-Me-More: make randconfig Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> --- arch/x86_64/Makefile | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86_64/Makefile b/arch/x86_64/Makefile index 13972148058da..6e38d4daeed7f 100644 --- a/arch/x86_64/Makefile +++ b/arch/x86_64/Makefile @@ -66,8 +66,8 @@ AFLAGS += $(call as-instr,.cfi_startproc\n.cfi_endproc,-DCONFIG_AS_CFI=1,) cflags-y += $(call as-instr,.cfi_startproc\n.cfi_signal_frame\n.cfi_endproc,-DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SIGNAL_FRAME=1,) AFLAGS += $(call as-instr,.cfi_startproc\n.cfi_signal_frame\n.cfi_endproc,-DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SIGNAL_FRAME=1,) -cflags-$(CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR) += $(shell $(CONFIG_SHELL) $(srctree)/scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh $(CC) -fstack-protector ) -cflags-$(CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_ALL) += $(shell $(CONFIG_SHELL) $(srctree)/scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh $(CC) -fstack-protector-all ) +cflags-$(CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR) += $(shell $(CONFIG_SHELL) $(srctree)/scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh "$(CC)" -fstack-protector ) +cflags-$(CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_ALL) += $(shell $(CONFIG_SHELL) $(srctree)/scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh "$(CC)" -fstack-protector-all ) CFLAGS += $(cflags-y) CFLAGS_KERNEL += $(cflags-kernel-y) -- 2.30.2