From cea08169ad4ce46c222a223d8f71db6d9c3f1385 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Zhang Qilong Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 22:25:42 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] bus: ti-sysc: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate for simplifing code. Signed-off-by: Zhang Qilong Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren --- drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c b/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c index c2e3b1c9d7afb..9df1e674d3f2a 100644 --- a/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c +++ b/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c @@ -3111,9 +3111,8 @@ static int sysc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) goto unprepare; pm_runtime_enable(ddata->dev); - error = pm_runtime_get_sync(ddata->dev); + error = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(ddata->dev); if (error < 0) { - pm_runtime_put_noidle(ddata->dev); pm_runtime_disable(ddata->dev); goto unprepare; } @@ -3171,9 +3170,8 @@ static int sysc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ddata->idle_work); - error = pm_runtime_get_sync(ddata->dev); + error = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(ddata->dev); if (error < 0) { - pm_runtime_put_noidle(ddata->dev); pm_runtime_disable(ddata->dev); goto unprepare; } -- 2.30.2