From dec08a837fda146fee498ffc5ecd0d2eeeacd025 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:42:23 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] x86: Remove the useless branch in c_start()
Since 'cpu == -1' in cpumask_next() is legal, no need to handle
'*pos == 0' specially.
About the comments:
/* just in case, cpu 0 is not the first */
A test with a cpumask in which cpu 0 is not the first has been
done, and it works well.
This patch will remove that useless branch to clean the code.
Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: kjwinchester@gmail.com
Cc: borislav.petkov@amd.com
Cc: ak@linux.intel.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1348033343-23658-1-git-send-email-wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
index 8022c66814851..fbd895562292c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
@@ -140,10 +140,7 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
static void *c_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
{
- if (*pos == 0) /* just in case, cpu 0 is not the first */
- *pos = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
- else
- *pos = cpumask_next(*pos - 1, cpu_online_mask);
+ *pos = cpumask_next(*pos - 1, cpu_online_mask);
if ((*pos) < nr_cpu_ids)
return &cpu_data(*pos);
return NULL;
--
2.30.2