From f08a06c9a35706349f74b7a18deefe3f89f73e8e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 23:36:04 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Clean up vmx_refresh_apicv_exec_ctrl()
Remove the condition check cpu_has_secondary_exec_ctrls(). Calling
vmx_refresh_apicv_exec_ctrl() premises secondary controls activated
and VMCS fields related to APICv valid as well. If it's invoked in
wrong circumstance at the worst case, VMX operation will report
VMfailValid error without further harmful impact and just functions
as if all the secondary controls were 0.
Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@intel.com>
Message-Id: <20220419153604.11786-1-guang.zeng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 19 +++++++++----------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 4238a55c26e64..3cbe3a38b3563 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -4201,16 +4201,15 @@ static void vmx_refresh_apicv_exec_ctrl(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
}
pin_controls_set(vmx, vmx_pin_based_exec_ctrl(vmx));
- if (cpu_has_secondary_exec_ctrls()) {
- if (kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(vcpu))
- secondary_exec_controls_setbit(vmx,
- SECONDARY_EXEC_APIC_REGISTER_VIRT |
- SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUAL_INTR_DELIVERY);
- else
- secondary_exec_controls_clearbit(vmx,
- SECONDARY_EXEC_APIC_REGISTER_VIRT |
- SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUAL_INTR_DELIVERY);
- }
+
+ if (kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(vcpu))
+ secondary_exec_controls_setbit(vmx,
+ SECONDARY_EXEC_APIC_REGISTER_VIRT |
+ SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUAL_INTR_DELIVERY);
+ else
+ secondary_exec_controls_clearbit(vmx,
+ SECONDARY_EXEC_APIC_REGISTER_VIRT |
+ SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUAL_INTR_DELIVERY);
vmx_update_msr_bitmap_x2apic(vcpu);
}
--
2.30.2