From f6691d0a20dc3c4434f48d885fa2b67d1ed7137a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alan Somers Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 01:54:42 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] Remove incorrect comment about fuse_entry_param.generation (#420) A comment said that fuse_entry_param.generation must be non-zero. However, I can't find anything in the kernel that requires that, and real-world file systems don't seem to follow that advice, either. --- include/fuse_lowlevel.h | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/fuse_lowlevel.h b/include/fuse_lowlevel.h index b7afe16..2073460 100644 --- a/include/fuse_lowlevel.h +++ b/include/fuse_lowlevel.h @@ -75,9 +75,6 @@ struct fuse_entry_param { * it must assign a new, previously unused generation number * to the inode at the same time. * - * The generation must be non-zero, otherwise FUSE will treat - * it as an error. - * */ uint64_t generation; -- 2.30.2